When this all began, now many months ago, I really never thought it would get to where we are now. The whole world has been affected by this crisis and it doesn’t look like it’s going away any time soon. Many have become ill, some very ill, some tragically has died. Lockdowns, restrictions, guidelines. Social distancing and face masks. Then more lockdowns and more restrictions.
Where will this all end? But before we get to that, we need to recall where we’ve been, then catch up to where we are now. This post is about where it all started and will also look at a few of the conspiracy theories about the virus’s possible origins. Part two will look at the mainstream media narrative and how the outbreak has been handled by government.
This began, so far as we know, with an outbreak of a novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China during the last two months of 2019. Talk of conspiracies abounds naturally, as does the obvious debunking attempts by those who think anyone who believes “that nonsense” should get on their tinfoil hat and go sit in the corner. As it happens, opinions within scientific circles always differ and any single scientific narrative on its own, shouldn’t be relied upon when seeking truth.
The following link leads to a post attempting to prove conclusively that nCOV2019 does not have a suspicious origin as an engineered, laboratory-generated virus. The science included in the post is completely lost on me. I include it only to reference the fact that opinions differ, as attested by the dialogue that follows the original post. Tackling Rumors of a Suspicious Origin of nCoV2019
As it transpired, the above-mentioned dialogue centred around whether the virus could have jumped from bats to humans, rather than being deliberately released in the area of the Wuhan seafood and animal market. The following article on ResearchGate states that “the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market boosted human-to-human transmission at an early stage.” The article further suggests that “there were super-spreaders mediating the spread of SARS-CoV-2 at the early stage of transmissions.”
So it seems likely that a super-spreader visited Wuhan Market, which resulted in the virus infecting many more people and the market getting the blame all over the media. But, was it as suggested above, transmitted from bats, or was there another origin?
Now that we’ve reminded ourselves of where this apparently came from, let’s have a look at some of the conspiracy theories centring around the virus’s origin. If the virus wasn’t originally transmitted from bats, was it instead manufactured and whether deliberately or not, released into the population of Wuhan during November or December 2019?
The Wuhan Biolab
This Washington Times post from 26th January carries the headline “Coronavirus may have originated in lab linked to China’s biowarfare program” Of course, keeping in line with the narrative of mainstream media, the post now carries an update dated 25th March that says “Since this story ran, scientists outside of China have had a chance to study the SARS-CoV-2 virus. They concluded it does not show signs of having been manufactured or purposefully manipulated in a lab, though the exact origin remains murky and experts debate whether it may have leaked from a Chinese lab that was studying it.”
So they don’t know where it came from, just that there are no signs that someone manufactured it. What we do know is that China’s most advanced virus research laboratory is the Wuhan Institute of Virology. According to this article dated 13th February, “Following the removal of the most senior health officials in Wuhan yesterday, (12th February) Chinese State Media has just reported that Chen Wei, China’s chief biochemical weapon defence expert, is now to be stationed in Wuhan to lead the efforts to overcome the deadly, pneumonia-like pathogen.” It sounds very much like the Chinese at this stage removed the civilian senior staff and replaced them with military. If there was a Chinese led conspiracy, why were the military only involved after February? So far, we don’t have real evidence of a genuine conspiracy, so let’s keep looking.
The above link leads to the official US Department of Justice website, there detailed charges against Harvard Bio-Chemist Charles Lieber (arrested on 28th January) and two Chinese nationals.
Dr Lieber is accused of lying to the American government by denying that he had any involvement with China’s Thousand Talents Plan. According to the DOJ page above, “these talent programs seek to lure Chinese overseas talent and foreign experts to bring their knowledge and experience to China and reward individuals for stealing proprietary information.” So it is alleged that Dr Lieber, while employed at Harvard University and leading a project involving nanoscience research, funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Defence (DOD), was also employed by the Chinese under a program designed to lure overseas talent and glean possibly highly sensitive information.
So, what was Dr Lieber researching in cooperation with the Chinese? According to this article, “The stated purpose of the agreement, which had a five-year effective term, was to ‘carry out advanced research and development of nanowire-based lithium-ion batteries with high performance for electric vehicles.’” The problem arises because, as stated in the article, of Charles Lieber’s 400+ research papers and 75+ US and Chinese patents, not one mentions anything to do with batteries or vehicles.
Of the two Chinese nationals, one is accused of “visa fraud, making false statements, acting as an agent of a foreign government and conspiracy.” The other, Harvard University-sponsored Chinese student Zaosong Zheng, “was arrested on Dec. 10, 2019, at Boston’s Logan International Airport and charged by criminal complaint with attempting to smuggle 21 vials of biological research to China.” According to the DOJ site, the biological culture that was being smuggled related to cancer-cell research, from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.
It’s important to say that these cases are ongoing and all three are presumed innocent until proven guilty. At the moment, there isn’t any evidence at least in the public domain, that suggests the 21 vials of biological culture referred to above was anything other than as stated.
Why does all this look like it could be connected to the COVID outbreak? Well, to put it bluntly, the timing sucks. Dr Lieber, a Harvard Bio-Chemist, was working in cooperation with the Chinese leading up to and at the time of the outbreak in Wuhan. Chinese Harvard student Zaosong Zheng was caught on his way to China on 10th December 2019 with 21 vials of culture hidden in a sock. If he just wanted to do cancer research, why the elaborate deception?
This New York Post article from 16th April suggests that the Wuhan lab may have unleashed the virus by accident, due to it being poorly equipped. The article also states that the Wuhan lab was receiving aid from US organisations.
Circumstantial and Coincidences
What research was happening at the Wuhan virus research lab and in what way, if any, were Charles Lieber and Zaosong Zheng involved? What were the prior movements of the Wuhan Market super-spreader and how/where did they become infected? Is there a connection where Charles Lieber was being funded by both the American DOD and China’s Thousand Talents Plan at the same time?
These questions and many more stir within the minds of many who don’t just believe what they are told by official sources. The above is not on its own evidence of a COVID conspiracy but looked at together, I can’t help but smell a rat. It’s all circumstantial and coincidences abound, but is that all it is?
So, over the past several months, an almost endless stream of conspiracy has been suggested over COVID-19, including tit-for-tat accusations between the Chinese and the Americans. The trouble is, when you live in a world of secrets, you never know if you’re ever being told the truth.
My suspicion is that while I do not think that either of their respective governments is directly involved in a specifically COVID-19 related conspiracy, there may be elements within who are. In the meantime, most of the rest of the world plays along with a narrative set by the WHO, propagated by mainstream media and those who influence them the most.
The result of everything that is creating all the suspicion of conspiracy centres around that old adage in politics: Never let a good crisis go to waste, as governments around the world take full advantage to push ahead with measures that create more power for them and progressively less basic human rights for the people.
If the idea of a New World Order type conspiracy is nothing more than tin foil hat nonsense, then governments around the world are playing into the hands of a conspiracy that doesn’t exist, nonetheless moving us all toward creating the thing in real life that so many imagine as the worst nightmare.
The World Health Organisation
So, who influences the WHO? According to the WHO’s website, assessed contributions, which are those made by member countries, now account for less than a quarter of contributions received. The rest comes from voluntary contributions, but their website isn’t obviously forthcoming on where these voluntary contributions come from. You must dig deep to find it.
By my reasoning anyway, if 75% of the WHO is funded by private sources, that effectively makes the WHO privately owned. So who by? According to this report, 48% of core voluntary contributions came from member states in 2019, which leaves 52% coming from other sources. The following table, taken from the report, provides the breakdown of the top 10 contributors for 2019:
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Other than the USA and the UK, the largest voluntary contributions come from GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Interestingly, the origin of GAVI is the Gates Foundation, which “pledged US$ 750 million to set up Gavi in 1999.” Further, “The (Gates) Foundation is a key Gavi partner in vaccine market shaping.” According to the above chart for 2019, GAVI and the Gates Foundation together, made more in voluntary contributions to the WHO, than the total contributions of any country, including the USA.
Other significant voluntary contributors include the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA), Rotary International and the World Bank.
So, the very organisation (WHO) that the world relies on to promote our health, is influenced by an effective controlling financial stake. This financial stake in the WHO comes primarily from the Gates Foundation and their partners, whose very existence is rooted in vaccine investments and the promotion of vaccines worldwide.
All this could suggest that Bill Gates is just a really nice guy who wants to help the world, assuming you think vaccines are a good thing. But Bill Gates isn’t always a really nice guy.
The Anti-trust Trial
Bill Gates and Microsoft became the subjects of a US anti-trust trial in the 1990s, where it was alleged among other things that Microsoft threatened Netscape at a secret meeting in June 1995. Microsoft allegedly threatened to “cut off its air supply” if Netscape didn’t agree to cede its browser business. In August 1995, Microsoft introduced its own free browser included with each copy of Windows. On November 5th 1999, Microsoft was found guilty of holding monopoly power. (Source: World War 3.0 – Microsoft and its Enemies, Ken Auletta 2001) The case dragged on for years, the appeals and final settlements not concluding till June 2004.
I include the above paragraph knowing that it isn’t directly relevant to our current situation, because if the management of this crisis is so heavily influenced by this man, should we not look to his character and former business practices?
Vaccines in the Developing World
So what about more recently? The WHO recently admitted that vaccines are the source of a new polio outbreak in Sudan. The Gates Foundation, GAVI and their partners have the “shared goal of creating equal access to new and underused vaccines for children living in the world’s poorest countries.”
The trouble is those poorer countries do not have the required legislation in place to protect their people from abuse by foreign giant corporations. Those that have some protective laws don’t have the means or the will to enforce them. With a protective legal framework lacking, their people are vulnerable to potentially being used as guinea pigs in the development of vaccines and other drugs.
In August 2014, an article in the India Times reported on a story about tribal children being given a cervical cancer vaccine. This happened in 2009, the same year as the Good Club meeting (see below). Thousands of girls between the ages of nine and fifteen were administered the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine in three rounds that year under the supervision of state health department officials. Many of the around 16,000 girls lived in state government-run hostels and many of their consent forms were signed either by hostel staff or by a thumbprint. The children concerned had no idea about the vaccine or the disease.
According to the article, many became very ill and by 2010, five had died. Another two children died in another area, where 14,000 more girls had been vaccinated with another brand of the vaccine. The article further states that these studies were sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
While there isn’t any direct evidence in the public domain or that I could find, that implicates the Gates Foundation, Gavi or their partners of deliberate wrongdoing, again, there’s enough circumstantial evidence that warrants further investigation. Add that to Gate’s own history of, at the very least, highly suspicious business practices.
Gates and Philanthropy
But he’s a philanthropist? According to this article, “Gates, surely, fits the description of someone who is both calling the shots and stands to gain handsomely from the COVID-19 pandemic. How? First, by investing in the same industries he’s giving charitable donations to and, second, by promoting a global public health agenda that benefits the companies he’s invested in and supports.” Further, “companies that have received donations that in turn made money for the Gates Foundation include Merck, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Vodafone, Sanofi, Ericsson, LG, Medtronic, Teva and “numerous startups,” So, his philanthropy is an exercise in business and profit, not goodwill.
The Good Club and Depopulation Agenda
What about Gate’s involvement with the so-called depopulation agenda? This is where a lot of people start joining the dots. In 2009, a group of billionaires met secretly to discuss ways of tackling a ‘disastrous’ environmental, social, and industrial threat. The nature of this threat? World overpopulation. This group was headed by Bill Gates and included such notables as David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey and others.
Called The Good Club, this meeting convened at the home of British biochemist Sir Paul Nurse. “Stacy Palmer, the editor of the Chronicle of Philanthropy, said the summit was unprecedented. “We only learnt about it afterwards, by accident. Normally these people are happy to talk good causes, but this is different – maybe because they don’t want to be seen as a global cabal,” he said.”
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was launched in 2000, while the appeals in the anti-trust trial were still ongoing and nine years before the Good Club meeting. The foundation helped to restore Gate’s damaged reputation, while at the same time launching a long-term worldwide vaccine initiative that would ultimately culminate in the COVID-19 vaccine initiative we are now seeing.
At this point, the dots aren’t hard to join. The conspiracy suggests a long-term plan that dates at least back to the time of the anti-trust trial, but is there any evidence of a direct link between Bill Gates and the conspiracy theory about an engineered coronavirus? Again, the answer is not directly, but the Gates Foundation has invested heavily in vaccines, the coronavirus and vaccine patents. This patent for example now carries a disclaimer stating it is not for COVID-19.
While the disclaimer specifically states that the Pirbright Institute “does not currently work with human coronaviruses”, they are none-the-less a partner in the search for a COVID-19 vaccine. In 2018, the Pirbright Institute received a $599,945 grant from the Gates Foundation “to evaluate antibody delivery platforms in the natural host, swine influenza model and facilitate the selection of mAbs to be taken to human clinical trials.”
It looks like the grant doesn’t have anything more to do with the coronavirus than the patent. Again no evidence, but some circumstantial that could suggest a connection. At the time of writing, I couldn’t find a patent online specifically for either the SARS-COV-2 virus or a vaccine for it. This patent by Richard A Rothschild, for a “System and Method for Testing for COVID-19”, has come under scrutiny because it was first applied for in 2015.
The Pirbright Institute’s coronavirus patent was also applied for in 2015. Here’s the thing. I don’t believe in coincidence, only in synchronicity, especially when it comes to numbers. Ralph Baric, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill published a study (November 9 2015) on his team’s efforts to engineer a virus with the surface protein of the SHC014 coronavirus, found in horseshoe bats in China.
Again, there isn’t any evidence of a link between this study and COVID-19. Perhaps 2015 was a big year for coronavirus research, but why did the Rothschilds apply for a COVID-19 testing patent in 2015, several years before COVID-19 existed? Perhaps we are to believe that the information has been updated since the original application. Currently, the Rothschild patent is still pending. So, just more coincidences?
The trouble is, you may never know if there were a real conspiracy because, unless they have a specific reason, the culprits are not likely to leave evidence in the public domain. My feeling is there will be an explanation for the Rothschild patent. It may even have been left deliberately to tease conspiracy theorists because if it were as it looks, it probably would not be public. Time will tell.
The trouble is, the pharmaceutical industry was already well known for its unethical practices, long before this.
Three major pharmaceutical companies that date from the end of World War 2 are direct descendants of what was Germany’s I.G. Farben. After the war, the Allies broke I.G. Farben up into three smaller companies: Hoechst, BASF and Bayer. In his book: “Corporate Crime in the pharmaceutical industry”, John Braithwaite states that “twelve top I.G. Farben executives were sentenced to terms of imprisonment for slavery and mistreatment offences at the Nuremberg war crimes trials. I.G. built and operated a massive chemical plant at Auschwitz with slave labour.”
I won’t include further details as it makes horrific reading. The reason this is relevant is because of what happened with these top executives afterwards. From the book: “After the war, the allies insisted that none of the war criminals be appointed to the boards of the new I.G. companies. Once allied control loosened, however, Hoechst in June 1955 appointed Friedrich Jaehne, one of the twelve war criminals sentenced to imprisonment at Nuremberg, to its supervisory board. In September of that year, he was elected Chairman. Bayer appointed Fitz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years at Nuremberg, as Chairman of its board in 1956.”
A comprehensive American study, conducted in 1979 by Clinard et al. found that pharmaceutical companies “have more than three times as many serious or moderately serious law violations per firm as other companies in the study.” The book describes at length a variety of examples of corporate crime in the pharmaceutical industry, including bribery, negligence or fraud in drug safety testing, unsafe manufacturing practices, antitrust, fiddling, corporate “drug pushing” and nefarious activities by drug companies in the third world.
It makes a sobering read. It is said in fact, that when this book came out, the pharmaceutical companies did everything they could to suppress this book, including trying to buy up every copy they could. Anything to limit the number of people who get to read it. I am not sure if I was lucky to find a copy, as it makes such an upsetting read.
Although pharmaceuticals are said to be responsible for the removal of tuberculosis, gastroenteritis, and diphtheria from among the ten leading causes of death in developed countries, (acknowledged in the book) I would dispute this to some extent. This is because much of these reductions in sickness could be attributable to greatly improved hygiene awareness and practices. What is known for sure, is that pharmaceuticals cause more people to die than many other causes of death, including war and all terrorism.
Just in case you think they’re now all fluffy bunnies because it was a long time ago, check out this DOJ Fact Sheet: SIGNIFICANT FALSE CLAIMS ACT SETTLEMENTS & JUDGMENTSFISCAL YEARS 2009-2016 Health Care Fraud To properly get the idea, check out the Big Pharma Death Clock.
Also, in case you are wondering why this is all relevant, it is the pharmaceutical companies, together with the Gates Foundation and their partners, who are all the people who want to make mountains of money by vaccinating you and all those you love!
The reason why people become suspicious is at least in part, because of missing information. Often, this missing information is deliberately kept hidden, whether the reasons are genuine. Sometimes it is an oversight. Sometimes it is for legal or corporate privacy reasons. And sometimes, it is because someone is up to no good.
Unfortunately, our governments and other powerful organisations have plenty of previous when it comes to deception and secret nefarious practices. Many so-called conspiracy theories have become conspiracy fact over time, as more information has come to light.
So far, conclusive proof of a COVID-19 conspiracy has not been found by this writer, but there is plenty of evidence to suggest at best, that we are being kept deliberately in the dark about how we got to where we now are. There is a massive amount of circumstantial evidence, however, that suggests something much more serious.
At worst, which unfortunately looks more likely, this pandemic is being deliberately manipulated for mass profit from vaccines, by a few greedy corporations and people. And manipulated by governments by the principle of never letting a good crisis go to waste, to gradually increase state control and reduce hard-fought-for basic human rights.
Part two of this article will look in detail, at the influence of mainstream media and the handling of the crisis by government, trying to answer the question, Where will this all end?